In the past decade, when the now common pocket computers suddenly took over the world by storm, the smartphone scene was pretty turbulent. The market was simply a mess following the release of the original iPhone in 2007-innumerable companies have tried different approaches, multiple operating systems have been challenged by domination and customers arenot sure what and how they can choose.
Only two giants remain in a level playing field after Symbian, BlackBear OS, Bada, Windows Mobile, and a few others: the iOs of Apple and the Android of Google.
How do these two differ, therefore, and what do they share? So what will you pick by 2020, more importantly? Let’s just find out! Let ‘s find out!
- Airtel Reported ‘[email protected]’ Answers for Organizations
- Tencent Music bets on crowded podcasting space in China
- How does coronavirus change the world?
- The first Android update in years from Google Authenticator helps you to switch your account between apps.
- Owing to Facebook SDK problems, many big iOS apps crashing during launch
iOS vs Android – The Basics
At first sight, the Interface tends to be identical to these two operating systems. And while both roots are based on Unix, in one respect iOS and Android are very different.
Apple’s own mobile operating system iOS is used mainly for iPhones and iPads, although iOS variants are also used in other products, including Apple TV and Apple Watch.
iOS is often designed and configured to make the most of the hardware of a computer, and Apple maintains a close eye on any applications developed for its mobile framework by third parties.
In comparison, Android OS that mainly be developed by Google, but it’s a Linux-based open-source OS. It means that anyone can enhance, change and adjust them to suit their needs so that Android is widely used and deployed on a wide range of devices.
This versatility nevertheless costs the optimization and security for which iOS is renowned.
It’s not uncommon to see someone say iPhones have “poor hardware.” And with facial value, it seems true: less-defined screens, smaller amounts of RAM than competing Android models …
One word: improvement. iOS does not need the embarrassing RAM quantities because it is able to hold more than a dozen of apps loaded and accessible with only 2 GB, although the resolution of some versions (as you see, Xr) may seem small, pixel density is still more than adequate.
In addition, the CPUs of Apple have over the years always seemed very poor. A12 Bionic chip is the first with eight cores with six and four cores respectively, with the preceding chips A11 and A10. In the meantime, only Android mid-range phones now have an Octa-Core CPU. The same is true: Apple CPUs have consistently exceeded the competition for a long time , due to superb optimization of the operating system. Yes, even older iPhones generation appears to benchmark newer Android flagships.
Altogether, although Android phones almost always have superior hardware on paper, in the vast majority of cases iPhones perform better.
Winner: iOS 😊😊😊
In the mobile display industry today two dominant technologies are IPS LCD and OLED. Some older technologies such as TFT are still used in cheaper low-end models.
Many new telephones, budgets and flagships are fitted with IPS LCD panels, which cover iPhones up to the iPhone 8 and the iPhone Xr and the iPhone Xs, Xs and Xs Max are actually the only OLED-equipped iPhones. Most OEMs select IPS over OLED on most Android telephones, with the exception of Samsung.
Both IPS LCD and OLED are now equally self-sufficient. From a technical point of view, for three reasons OLED is the superior technology:
- This performance is higher. Every pixel is illuminated with an OLED display individually, so that an active backlight is needed for the display to light up the entire screen.
- The viewing angles are higher. In this regard, higher-quality IPS displays such as those seen on iPhones can almost suit OLED, but the disparity remains visible.
- It is less light-reflecting. For people that spend a lot of time outside and want no glow in their viewing experience. This is particularly important.
On the other hand, it’s a bit cheaper than OLED and so many smartphone manufacurers continue to favor the primary advantage of IPS LCD. As above mentioned, quality IPS panels are just as good as an OLED screen for viewing angles and color reproduction. Bear in mind, however, that a low-cost phone does not deliver the same standard of display as a flagship as it uses the same technology!
As for who wins, it will be a tie because both iPhones and Android phones are using OLED now.
Winner: Draw 😶😶
Like displays, OEM depends entirely on the accuracy of a smartphone camera. For Apple, iPhones have had decent cameras, but most high-end Android phones offer just as decent if not better camera settings.
On paper and in reality, the variations between flagship cameras are still fairly small. The only way of telling the cameras apart is to side by side, say, with the iPhone Xs and Google Pixel 3. And even then, there will be no real difference in the untrained eye.
The cheaper budget and medium range Android phones are different in camera quality, depending on the area in which they choose to cut corners from OEM to OEM.
Winner: Tie 🤗🤗
In the early years of Ios, iOS definitely was at the forefront of the number of devices on the App Store. Today, however, the Google Play Store offers 2.6 million apps in March 2018, over 2.2 million in the App Store.
This breakdown stems mainly from the open-source nature of Android and looser Google rules in the play store. Android phones not only allow you to access app stores from third parties, including the Amazon Appstore. As if this isn’t enough variety, Android phones often require users to manually insert .apk files to ‘side-load’ applications.
Now everyone knows that quantity is not the same. While Android may be a pioneer in the previous group, the strict control Apple has over apps on its platform ensures the apps function properly and are fully secure and free from malicious code.
Finally, the question of pricing is here. The Play Store certainly has more apps than the App Store, but some strings are attached and ads are these strings. Naturally, nobody wants to be distracted by irritating ads while playing or using games, so you’ll have to purchase the app like you would in the app store if you want to have an ad-free experience. However, it is a very good choice to try an app free before you purchase.
In the end, we will give Android the win in this category, as a wider range of different apps is always welcome, let alone access certain kind of apps which are not being made available
Winner: Android 😊😊
It has been almost the same deal with Apple for the last few generations. We ‘d see a new phone with the same basic design every year. When the iPhone X was introduced, things changed, including a screen with very fine bezels and announcing a new era in iPhone design that would remain largely unchanged in the coming years. However, given that only one company produces iPhones and publishes only a few models every year, it is understandable that there is no diversity.
On the other hand, Android phones are not lacking in variety.
Unlike the narrow selection of Apple, there are innumerable Apple Android phones, with dozens of companies pushing out dozens of models annually. Sure, telephones don’t look more varied than they were before, but almost always different OEMs sell something unique, both hardware and software.
So, in this way, who wins? It’s obviously Android, because Android phones cover a significantly wider range of pricing and usually introduce some useful features years prior to their iOS deployment.
Winner: Android 🤩🤩
Of example, the iOS experience is very stable but not personalizable at all. iPhones all have the same seamless design; while it is undoubtedly the best design of a handset, it is still a welcome degree of personalization and an environment in which iOS is sadly lacking.
Ios allows the app to make an enormous degree of adaption to the other end of the continuum. While some OEMs like Huawei are up on the operating system with their own rigid iOS-like skins, the user is always able to download a more flexible launcher such as the Nova Launcher, bringing Android experience on every phone to a stock.
Moreover, an Android rooted telephone would allow even more customisation, even though it carries the risk of destabilizing the device and of voiding the warranty.
As you can see, in this connection, iOS and Android are two extremes. Apple adheres to the philosophy of “unless it is disconnected, do not fix it” and provides smooth, consistent experience on every device, whilst the open-source nature of Android provides users and programmers with unprecedented freedom. That said, Android wins this video game, but it’s up to the user if this type of customizability is important.
Winner: Android 🤩🤩
In this respect, there is not much to tell and from the winner, it is very obvious. Everyone knows Apple devices are costly, time-consuming. It’s not only the case for iPhones, but also for all the rest: MacBooks, iMacs, Apple Watches, and almost any gadget you might call.
The only way to get an inexpensive iPhone other than an iPhone SE is to get an older model, maybe even a second-hand model. Now, regardless of how long iPhones are kept updated, they will be pretty costly.
When you pay peanut, you get monkeys, you ‘re going to find brand new Android phones for under $100. The cheapest Android handsets typically give horrible performance, but an Android phone of $300 in the mid-range may have all the functionality and performance of your iphone.
Winner: Android 😏😏
As described above, Apple devices are considered to be robust, although virtually no downsides in performance can be observed. This is largely due to the fact that after its initial release every iOS system receives around 5 years of OS updates.
In contrast , new Android versions are slow to be implemented on most devices , particularly those that are using a stronger modified operating system version. It may take months for updates to reach any device in such cases.
So even then, you’re always asked if a computer should be modified – and if so, you don’t know yet whether the upgrade should boost your experience or make the system unstable and slow it down
In general , two operating system updates are provided by the Android flagship, while mid-range phones typically receive only one. As far as the low-end phones are concerned, you will be kept with the Android edition, while other enhancements and security updates will likely continue to be spread over time.
All that said, the iOS wins this round is very clear.
Winner: iOS 😫😫
Android phone numbers and may be cheaper, but iPhones certainly have better value. In reality, iPhones can be less expensive in the long term. That might look like a humorous joke, but bear with us.
As we have already found, iPhones are fast – not due to their hardware but to optimized OS, and for about five years after its launch each iPhone receives consistent OS updates.
Not only does this make them more future-proof, but it also means that second-hand iPhones go much higher than Android handsets.
So it’s possible to live with an iPhone, and you can see that the efficiency has practically deteriorated over the years, or just sell this one after a while and get a brand new one with a fairly small extra expenditure (not counting the inevitable battery replacement on the way). Generally, iPhones are more convenient if you do not want to rely on anything that is not a flagship, and are accustomed to regularly receiving your new phone.
Naturally, an Android phone will still be the better option if you’re happy with a mid-range or budget smartphone and do not deal with OS updates. However, in this category we have to win iOS for all the aforementioned reasons if we speak flagships.
Winner: iOS 🙄🙄